Elkins
This was recorded for a conference in Bressanone, Italy, which I
couldn't attend; it was screened at the conference in autumn 2018.
The "seven ways" of looking at images include:
1. Do images have a nature? (An ontology? An essence?)
2. Why is it so difficult to classify images? Why can't they be
classified the way that animals, plants, and so many other kinds of
objects are?
3. What sort of thing is _not_ an image? Is there anything that is
clearly non-imagistic?
4. How closely do people look at images? Is the current discourse in
materiality getting closer to the texture of paintings, for example?
5. What does it mean that so many people who work with images (artists,
historians, theorists) do not have theories of what images are?
This material builds on the book "What is an Image?" and also the book
"Visual Studies: A Skeptical Introduction." It includes thoughts on the
nature of writing in art history, art theory, aesthetics, visual
culture, and visual studies.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCORRn2PTxP0AKpK7oK--e1A
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Indigenous design | agencies | processes
IDIA Indigenous Design & Innovation Aotearoa Local Contexts Frameworks for culturally appropriate engagement with cultural heritage he...
-
'All images, regardless of the date of their creation, exist simultaneously and are pressed into service to help us make sense of othe...
-
On the iconophilia website, full text of Ian McLean's paper : Anxious identities: reinventing Australia in a changing world presented a...
No comments:
Post a Comment